Correct retention before enabling automatic deletion (#8)
* Correct retention before enabling automatic deletion - Compute each retention tier's kept set independently from its own name range and union them, instead of carrying a single 'previous backup' comparison across tier boundaries - that carry-over was the actual cause of bug #32 (a coarser tier could evict a backup a finer tier, or the always-keep-latest rule, had already decided to retain) - Group weekly retention by (ISO year, ISO week) instead of ISO week number alone, fixing bug #33 (same week number in different years, or late-December dates that belong to next year's ISO week 1, were treated as duplicates/collisions) - Validate the computed retention plan (latest snapshot present, no phantom entries) before deleting anything - Fix cli.py to run initiate_backup before cleanup_old_backups, and skip cleanup entirely if the backup raised - retention must only run once a new snapshot is durable and complete, and a failed backup must never trigger deletion of history - Quarantine (rename) a deletion candidate before recursively removing it, reusing the already-hardened stale-staging-dir cleanup to finish the job if the process crashes mid-delete - Remove both retention xfail markers (bugs #32, #33) now that the tests they guarded pass; update pre-existing tests whose expectations encoded the old bug (deleting the latest snapshot when it collided with the next-newest one in a coarser bucket) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Address Copilot review: replace asserts with runtime checks, don't swallow quarantine-delete failures - Retention-plan validation now raises BackupFailedError instead of using assert, which python -O would silently strip ahead of a destructive operation - _quarantine_and_delete no longer passes ignore_errors=True to rmtree; a removal failure is now logged with the quarantine path so operators can find and retry it, instead of silently leaving a hidden directory consuming space Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Maxim Shulga <maxim.shulga@alludo.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
5 files changed
+209
-75
No files matched your search
+6
-6
@@ -89,13 +89,13 @@ Acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
### Correct retention before enabling automatic deletion
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Compute retained snapshots independently for each policy tier and keep
|
||||
- [x] Compute retained snapshots independently for each policy tier and keep
|
||||
the union of those sets.
|
||||
- [ ] Compare ISO year and ISO week together.
|
||||
- [ ] Generate and validate a retention plan before deleting anything.
|
||||
- [ ] Run retention only after a new snapshot is durable and complete.
|
||||
- [ ] Quarantine deletion candidates before recursive removal.
|
||||
- [ ] Convert the existing retention `xfail` cases into passing tests.
|
||||
- [x] Compare ISO year and ISO week together.
|
||||
- [x] Generate and validate a retention plan before deleting anything.
|
||||
- [x] Run retention only after a new snapshot is durable and complete.
|
||||
- [x] Quarantine deletion candidates before recursive removal.
|
||||
- [x] Convert the existing retention `xfail` cases into passing tests.
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+106
-49
@@ -548,62 +548,119 @@ def cleanup_old_backups(backups_dir: str,
|
||||
.strftime(BACKUP_ENT_FMT)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
keep = _compute_retention_plan(all_backups, thresholds)
|
||||
# Validate the plan before deleting anything: the most recent snapshot
|
||||
# must always survive, and the plan can never invent a backup that
|
||||
# doesn't exist. Plain `assert` would be stripped under `python -O`,
|
||||
# silently disabling this check ahead of a destructive operation, so
|
||||
# this is an explicit, always-on check instead.
|
||||
if all_backups[0] not in keep:
|
||||
raise BackupFailedError(
|
||||
"Refusing to run retention: computed plan drops the latest "
|
||||
"snapshot %s" % all_backups[0].name
|
||||
)
|
||||
if not keep <= set(all_backups):
|
||||
raise BackupFailedError(
|
||||
"Refusing to run retention: computed plan keeps a backup "
|
||||
"that doesn't exist"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
backups_dir_abs = _canonical(backups_dir)
|
||||
repo_id = _ensure_repo_id(backups_dir)
|
||||
|
||||
prev_backup = all_backups[0]
|
||||
to_remove = {b: False for b in all_backups}
|
||||
|
||||
for backup in all_backups[1:]:
|
||||
# skip all backups made after threshold
|
||||
if backup.name > thresholds["all"]:
|
||||
prev_backup = backup
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
# leave only one backup per day for backups made after threshold
|
||||
if backup.name > thresholds["daily"]:
|
||||
if (_date_from_backup(prev_backup).date()
|
||||
== _date_from_backup(backup).date()):
|
||||
to_remove[prev_backup] = True
|
||||
prev_backup = backup
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
# leave only one backup per week for backups made after threshold
|
||||
if backup.name > thresholds["weekly"]:
|
||||
if (_date_from_backup(prev_backup).isocalendar()[1]
|
||||
== _date_from_backup(backup).isocalendar()[1]):
|
||||
to_remove[prev_backup] = True
|
||||
prev_backup = backup
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
# leave only one backup per month for backups made after threshold
|
||||
if backup.name > thresholds["monthly"]:
|
||||
if (_date_from_backup(prev_backup).date().replace(day=1)
|
||||
== _date_from_backup(backup).date().replace(day=1)):
|
||||
to_remove[prev_backup] = True
|
||||
prev_backup = backup
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
# leave only one backup per year for backups made after threshold
|
||||
if backup.name > thresholds["yearly"]:
|
||||
if (_date_from_backup(prev_backup).date().replace(month=1, day=1)
|
||||
== _date_from_backup(backup).date().replace(month=1, day=1)):
|
||||
to_remove[prev_backup] = True
|
||||
prev_backup = backup
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
to_remove[backup] = True
|
||||
|
||||
for backup, do_delete in to_remove.items():
|
||||
if not do_delete:
|
||||
for backup in all_backups:
|
||||
if backup in keep:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
if dry_run:
|
||||
_lg.info("Would remove old backup %s", backup.name)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
if not _verify_safe_to_delete(backup, backups_dir_abs, repo_id):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
_lg.info("Removing old backup %s", backup.name)
|
||||
shutil.rmtree(backup.path)
|
||||
_quarantine_and_delete(backup, backups_dir_abs, repo_id)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _compute_retention_plan(all_backups: List[os.DirEntry],
|
||||
thresholds: Dict[str, str]) -> set:
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Compute the set of backups to retain. Each tier's retained set is
|
||||
computed independently from its own name range and unioned with the
|
||||
rest, so a coarser tier (e.g. monthly) can never override a decision
|
||||
a finer tier (e.g. weekly) already made about a backup that isn't
|
||||
even in the coarser tier's range - unlike carrying a single "previous
|
||||
backup compared against" value across tier boundaries, which is what
|
||||
let a coarser tier silently evict a backup a finer tier had decided
|
||||
to keep.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
def _oldest_per_group(members, key_func) -> set:
|
||||
groups: Dict[object, os.DirEntry] = {}
|
||||
for member in members:
|
||||
key = key_func(member)
|
||||
if key not in groups or member.name < groups[key].name:
|
||||
groups[key] = member
|
||||
return set(groups.values())
|
||||
|
||||
def _band(lower: str, upper: str) -> List[os.DirEntry]:
|
||||
return [b for b in all_backups if lower < b.name <= upper]
|
||||
|
||||
keep = {all_backups[0]} # the most recent snapshot is always retained
|
||||
|
||||
keep |= {b for b in all_backups if b.name > thresholds["all"]}
|
||||
|
||||
keep |= _oldest_per_group(
|
||||
_band(thresholds["daily"], thresholds["all"]),
|
||||
lambda b: _date_from_backup(b).date(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
keep |= _oldest_per_group(
|
||||
_band(thresholds["weekly"], thresholds["daily"]),
|
||||
# (ISO year, ISO week): ISO week alone collides across years, and
|
||||
# a year spanning ISO week 53 puts late-December dates in the
|
||||
# next ISO year - isocalendar() already accounts for both.
|
||||
lambda b: _date_from_backup(b).isocalendar()[:2],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
keep |= _oldest_per_group(
|
||||
_band(thresholds["monthly"], thresholds["weekly"]),
|
||||
lambda b: (_date_from_backup(b).year, _date_from_backup(b).month),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
keep |= _oldest_per_group(
|
||||
_band(thresholds["yearly"], thresholds["monthly"]),
|
||||
lambda b: _date_from_backup(b).year,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
return keep
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _quarantine_and_delete(entry: os.DirEntry, backups_dir_abs: str,
|
||||
repo_id: str):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Quarantine a retention deletion candidate before recursively removing
|
||||
it: rename it out of its snapshot name first. If the process crashes
|
||||
between the rename and the removal, the quarantined directory keeps
|
||||
the staging-dir prefix, so the existing stale-staging-dir cleanup -
|
||||
with the same boundary/mount/symlink safety checks - finishes
|
||||
removing it on the next run, rather than leaving a half-deleted
|
||||
directory sitting under its original snapshot name.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if not _verify_safe_to_delete(entry, backups_dir_abs, repo_id):
|
||||
return
|
||||
quarantine_path = os.path.join(
|
||||
backups_dir_abs, "%strash-%s" % (STAGING_PREFIX, entry.name)
|
||||
)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
os.rename(entry.path, quarantine_path)
|
||||
except OSError as err:
|
||||
_lg.error("Failed to quarantine %s before deletion: %s",
|
||||
entry.path, err)
|
||||
return
|
||||
_lg.info("Removing old backup %s", entry.name)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
shutil.rmtree(quarantine_path)
|
||||
except OSError as err:
|
||||
_lg.error(
|
||||
"Failed to remove quarantined backup %s: %s. It remains on "
|
||||
"disk under %s and will be retried on the next cleanup or "
|
||||
"backup startup.", entry.name, err, quarantine_path
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def process_backed_entry(backup_dir: str,
|
||||
|
||||
+7
-2
@@ -105,8 +105,11 @@ def main():
|
||||
|
||||
exit_code = 0
|
||||
try:
|
||||
backup.cleanup_old_backups(backups_dir=backups_dir_abs,
|
||||
dry_run=args.dry_run)
|
||||
# Retention deletes old snapshots, so it must only run once the
|
||||
# new snapshot is durable and complete - never before, and never
|
||||
# if the backup below raised. Running it first (or unconditionally
|
||||
# after a failure) would let a failed backup destroy history
|
||||
# that a successful one would have covered.
|
||||
backup.initiate_backup(
|
||||
sources=args.sources,
|
||||
backups_dir=backups_dir_abs,
|
||||
@@ -114,6 +117,8 @@ def main():
|
||||
external_rsync=args.external_rsync,
|
||||
external_hardlink=args.external_hardlink,
|
||||
)
|
||||
backup.cleanup_old_backups(backups_dir=backups_dir_abs,
|
||||
dry_run=args.dry_run)
|
||||
except backup.BackupFailedError as err:
|
||||
_lg.error("Backup failed: %s", err)
|
||||
exit_code = 1
|
||||
|
||||
+55
-15
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ class TestBackupCleanup:
|
||||
"""Test threshold for keeping weekly backups"""
|
||||
mock_datetime.now.return_value = datetime(2021, 11, 11)
|
||||
backups = [
|
||||
add_backup("20211111_0300"), # remove, not first weekly (Thu)
|
||||
add_backup("20211111_0300"), # keep, latest snapshot always kept
|
||||
add_backup("20211110_0300"), # remove, not first weekly (Wed)
|
||||
add_backup("20211108_0100"), # keep, first weekly 2021-11-08 (Mon)
|
||||
add_backup("20211107_2300"), # remove, not first weekly (Sun)
|
||||
@@ -122,8 +122,8 @@ class TestBackupCleanup:
|
||||
add_backup("20211002_0100"), # remove, older than 5 weeks
|
||||
|
||||
]
|
||||
expected_backups = [backups[2], backups[4], backups[6],
|
||||
backups[9], backups[12]]
|
||||
expected_backups = [backups[0], backups[2], backups[4],
|
||||
backups[6], backups[9], backups[12]]
|
||||
run_cleanup(keep_weekly=5)
|
||||
check_backups(expected_backups)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -133,12 +133,12 @@ class TestBackupCleanup:
|
||||
"""Test threshold for keeping weekly backups"""
|
||||
mock_datetime.now.return_value = datetime(2021, 11, 11)
|
||||
backups = [
|
||||
add_backup("20211111_0300"), # remove, not first weekly (Thu)
|
||||
add_backup("20211111_0300"), # keep, latest snapshot always kept
|
||||
add_backup("20211110_0300"), # keep, first weekly (Wed)
|
||||
add_backup("20211107_0100"), # remove, not first weekly (Sun)
|
||||
add_backup("20211102_0100"), # keep, first weekly (Tue)
|
||||
]
|
||||
expected_backups = [backups[1], backups[3]]
|
||||
expected_backups = [backups[0], backups[1], backups[3]]
|
||||
run_cleanup(keep_weekly=5)
|
||||
check_backups(expected_backups)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ class TestBackupCleanup:
|
||||
"""Test threshold for keeping yearly backups"""
|
||||
mock_datetime.now.return_value = datetime(2021, 11, 11)
|
||||
backups = [
|
||||
add_backup("20211103_0300"), # remove, not first yearly in 2021
|
||||
add_backup("20211103_0300"), # keep, latest snapshot always kept
|
||||
add_backup("20210810_0000"), # remove, not first yearly in 2021
|
||||
add_backup("20210716_0100"), # keep, first yearly in 2021
|
||||
add_backup("20201216_0100"), # remove, not first yearly in 2020
|
||||
@@ -181,7 +181,8 @@ class TestBackupCleanup:
|
||||
add_backup("20171116_0100"), # remove, older than 3 years
|
||||
add_backup("20171115_0100"), # remove, older than 3 years
|
||||
]
|
||||
expected_backups = [backups[2], backups[4], backups[6], backups[8]]
|
||||
expected_backups = [backups[0], backups[2], backups[4], backups[6],
|
||||
backups[8]]
|
||||
run_cleanup(keep_yearly=3)
|
||||
check_backups(expected_backups)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -200,8 +201,6 @@ class TestBackupCleanup:
|
||||
run_cleanup(keep_all=2, dry_run=True)
|
||||
check_backups(backups)
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.xfail(reason="Bug #32: coarser retention tiers override finer "
|
||||
"tiers, violating retention guarantees", strict=True)
|
||||
@mock.patch(f"{bk.__name__}.datetime", wraps=datetime)
|
||||
def test_combined_retention_policies(self, mock_datetime, add_backup,
|
||||
run_cleanup, check_backups):
|
||||
@@ -333,13 +332,12 @@ class TestBackupCleanup:
|
||||
add_backup("20201228_1200"), # Mon, ISO 2020-W53
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
# Keep one week: should keep oldest backup from ISO week 53
|
||||
expected = [backups[5]] # 20201228
|
||||
# Keep one week: should keep oldest backup from ISO week 53, plus
|
||||
# the latest snapshot overall (always kept)
|
||||
expected = [backups[0], backups[5]] # 20210103, 20201228
|
||||
run_cleanup(keep_weekly=1)
|
||||
check_backups(expected)
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.xfail(reason="Bug #33: Weekly retention bug: same ISO week "
|
||||
"number across years treated as duplicates", strict=True)
|
||||
@mock.patch(f"{bk.__name__}.datetime", wraps=datetime)
|
||||
def test_iso_week_number_across_years(self, mock_datetime, add_backup,
|
||||
run_cleanup, check_backups):
|
||||
@@ -383,8 +381,9 @@ class TestBackupCleanup:
|
||||
add_backup("20250112_1200"), # Sun, ISO 2025-W02
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
# Keep weekly: oldest from week 1 (Dec 30) and week 2 (Jan 8)
|
||||
expected = [backups[0], backups[4]]
|
||||
# Keep weekly: oldest from week 1 (Dec 30) and week 2 (Jan 8), plus
|
||||
# the latest snapshot overall (always kept)
|
||||
expected = [backups[0], backups[4], backups[5]]
|
||||
run_cleanup(keep_weekly=10)
|
||||
check_backups(expected)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -931,3 +930,44 @@ class TestDeletionBoundarySafety:
|
||||
run_cleanup(keep_all=0)
|
||||
|
||||
assert not os.path.exists(old.path)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestRetentionPlan:
|
||||
"""Tests for the independent-per-tier retention plan computation."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_latest_snapshot_always_retained_even_if_grouped_with_next(
|
||||
self, backup_dir, add_backup, run_cleanup
|
||||
):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Regression for the bug where the latest snapshot could be
|
||||
evicted if it shared a weekly/monthly/yearly bucket with the
|
||||
next-newest one, because retention carried a single "previous
|
||||
backup" comparison across tier boundaries.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
latest = add_backup("20211111_0300")
|
||||
add_backup("20211110_0300") # same ISO week as latest
|
||||
add_backup("20211004_0100")
|
||||
|
||||
run_cleanup(keep_weekly=5)
|
||||
|
||||
assert os.path.isdir(latest.path)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_quarantined_dir_recovered_by_stale_staging_cleanup(
|
||||
self, backup_dir, add_backup
|
||||
):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
If a crash happens between quarantine (rename) and the recursive
|
||||
delete, the quarantined directory must still get cleaned up on
|
||||
the next startup via cleanup_stale_staging_dirs.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
add_backup("20220101_0000")
|
||||
old = add_backup("20200101_0000")
|
||||
|
||||
quarantine_path = os.path.join(
|
||||
str(backup_dir), f"{bk.STAGING_PREFIX}trash-{old.name}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
os.rename(old.path, quarantine_path)
|
||||
|
||||
bk.cleanup_stale_staging_dirs(str(backup_dir))
|
||||
|
||||
assert not os.path.exists(quarantine_path)
|
||||
+35
-3
@@ -466,12 +466,44 @@ class TestLockHandling:
|
||||
assert result == 1
|
||||
m_release.assert_called_once_with(str(backups_dir))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_skips_cleanup_when_backup_fails(self, tmp_path):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
A failed backup must prevent every retention deletion: if
|
||||
initiate_backup raises, cleanup_old_backups must never run.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
backups_dir = tmp_path / "backups"
|
||||
backups_dir.mkdir()
|
||||
source = tmp_path / "src"
|
||||
source.mkdir()
|
||||
|
||||
from curateipsum import backup
|
||||
|
||||
with mock.patch('sys.argv', ['cura-te-ipsum', '-b',
|
||||
str(backups_dir), str(source)]):
|
||||
with mock.patch('curateipsum.backup.set_backups_lock',
|
||||
return_value=True):
|
||||
with mock.patch(
|
||||
'curateipsum.backup.cleanup_old_backups') \
|
||||
as m_cleanup:
|
||||
with mock.patch(
|
||||
'curateipsum.backup.initiate_backup',
|
||||
side_effect=backup.BackupFailedError("boom")):
|
||||
with mock.patch(
|
||||
'curateipsum.backup.release_backups_lock'):
|
||||
cli.main()
|
||||
|
||||
m_cleanup.assert_not_called()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestBackupExecution:
|
||||
"""Test backup execution flow."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_calls_cleanup_before_initiate(self, tmp_path):
|
||||
"""Should call cleanup_old_backups before initiate_backup."""
|
||||
def test_calls_initiate_before_cleanup(self, tmp_path):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Should call initiate_backup before cleanup_old_backups: retention
|
||||
deletes old snapshots, so it must only run once the new snapshot
|
||||
is durable, never before it.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
backups_dir = tmp_path / "backups"
|
||||
backups_dir.mkdir()
|
||||
source = tmp_path / "src"
|
||||
@@ -497,7 +529,7 @@ class TestBackupExecution:
|
||||
'curateipsum.backup.release_backups_lock'):
|
||||
cli.main()
|
||||
|
||||
assert call_order == ['cleanup', 'initiate']
|
||||
assert call_order == ['initiate', 'cleanup']
|
||||
|
||||
def test_passes_correct_arguments_to_initiate_backup(self, tmp_path):
|
||||
"""Should pass all required arguments to initiate_backup."""
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user