Correct retention before enabling automatic deletion (#8)
* Correct retention before enabling automatic deletion - Compute each retention tier's kept set independently from its own name range and union them, instead of carrying a single 'previous backup' comparison across tier boundaries - that carry-over was the actual cause of bug #32 (a coarser tier could evict a backup a finer tier, or the always-keep-latest rule, had already decided to retain) - Group weekly retention by (ISO year, ISO week) instead of ISO week number alone, fixing bug #33 (same week number in different years, or late-December dates that belong to next year's ISO week 1, were treated as duplicates/collisions) - Validate the computed retention plan (latest snapshot present, no phantom entries) before deleting anything - Fix cli.py to run initiate_backup before cleanup_old_backups, and skip cleanup entirely if the backup raised - retention must only run once a new snapshot is durable and complete, and a failed backup must never trigger deletion of history - Quarantine (rename) a deletion candidate before recursively removing it, reusing the already-hardened stale-staging-dir cleanup to finish the job if the process crashes mid-delete - Remove both retention xfail markers (bugs #32, #33) now that the tests they guarded pass; update pre-existing tests whose expectations encoded the old bug (deleting the latest snapshot when it collided with the next-newest one in a coarser bucket) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Address Copilot review: replace asserts with runtime checks, don't swallow quarantine-delete failures - Retention-plan validation now raises BackupFailedError instead of using assert, which python -O would silently strip ahead of a destructive operation - _quarantine_and_delete no longer passes ignore_errors=True to rmtree; a removal failure is now logged with the quarantine path so operators can find and retry it, instead of silently leaving a hidden directory consuming space Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Maxim Shulga <maxim.shulga@alludo.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
5 files changed
+209
-75
No files matched your search
+55
-15
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ class TestBackupCleanup:
|
||||
"""Test threshold for keeping weekly backups"""
|
||||
mock_datetime.now.return_value = datetime(2021, 11, 11)
|
||||
backups = [
|
||||
add_backup("20211111_0300"), # remove, not first weekly (Thu)
|
||||
add_backup("20211111_0300"), # keep, latest snapshot always kept
|
||||
add_backup("20211110_0300"), # remove, not first weekly (Wed)
|
||||
add_backup("20211108_0100"), # keep, first weekly 2021-11-08 (Mon)
|
||||
add_backup("20211107_2300"), # remove, not first weekly (Sun)
|
||||
@@ -122,8 +122,8 @@ class TestBackupCleanup:
|
||||
add_backup("20211002_0100"), # remove, older than 5 weeks
|
||||
|
||||
]
|
||||
expected_backups = [backups[2], backups[4], backups[6],
|
||||
backups[9], backups[12]]
|
||||
expected_backups = [backups[0], backups[2], backups[4],
|
||||
backups[6], backups[9], backups[12]]
|
||||
run_cleanup(keep_weekly=5)
|
||||
check_backups(expected_backups)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -133,12 +133,12 @@ class TestBackupCleanup:
|
||||
"""Test threshold for keeping weekly backups"""
|
||||
mock_datetime.now.return_value = datetime(2021, 11, 11)
|
||||
backups = [
|
||||
add_backup("20211111_0300"), # remove, not first weekly (Thu)
|
||||
add_backup("20211111_0300"), # keep, latest snapshot always kept
|
||||
add_backup("20211110_0300"), # keep, first weekly (Wed)
|
||||
add_backup("20211107_0100"), # remove, not first weekly (Sun)
|
||||
add_backup("20211102_0100"), # keep, first weekly (Tue)
|
||||
]
|
||||
expected_backups = [backups[1], backups[3]]
|
||||
expected_backups = [backups[0], backups[1], backups[3]]
|
||||
run_cleanup(keep_weekly=5)
|
||||
check_backups(expected_backups)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ class TestBackupCleanup:
|
||||
"""Test threshold for keeping yearly backups"""
|
||||
mock_datetime.now.return_value = datetime(2021, 11, 11)
|
||||
backups = [
|
||||
add_backup("20211103_0300"), # remove, not first yearly in 2021
|
||||
add_backup("20211103_0300"), # keep, latest snapshot always kept
|
||||
add_backup("20210810_0000"), # remove, not first yearly in 2021
|
||||
add_backup("20210716_0100"), # keep, first yearly in 2021
|
||||
add_backup("20201216_0100"), # remove, not first yearly in 2020
|
||||
@@ -181,7 +181,8 @@ class TestBackupCleanup:
|
||||
add_backup("20171116_0100"), # remove, older than 3 years
|
||||
add_backup("20171115_0100"), # remove, older than 3 years
|
||||
]
|
||||
expected_backups = [backups[2], backups[4], backups[6], backups[8]]
|
||||
expected_backups = [backups[0], backups[2], backups[4], backups[6],
|
||||
backups[8]]
|
||||
run_cleanup(keep_yearly=3)
|
||||
check_backups(expected_backups)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -200,8 +201,6 @@ class TestBackupCleanup:
|
||||
run_cleanup(keep_all=2, dry_run=True)
|
||||
check_backups(backups)
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.xfail(reason="Bug #32: coarser retention tiers override finer "
|
||||
"tiers, violating retention guarantees", strict=True)
|
||||
@mock.patch(f"{bk.__name__}.datetime", wraps=datetime)
|
||||
def test_combined_retention_policies(self, mock_datetime, add_backup,
|
||||
run_cleanup, check_backups):
|
||||
@@ -333,13 +332,12 @@ class TestBackupCleanup:
|
||||
add_backup("20201228_1200"), # Mon, ISO 2020-W53
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
# Keep one week: should keep oldest backup from ISO week 53
|
||||
expected = [backups[5]] # 20201228
|
||||
# Keep one week: should keep oldest backup from ISO week 53, plus
|
||||
# the latest snapshot overall (always kept)
|
||||
expected = [backups[0], backups[5]] # 20210103, 20201228
|
||||
run_cleanup(keep_weekly=1)
|
||||
check_backups(expected)
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.xfail(reason="Bug #33: Weekly retention bug: same ISO week "
|
||||
"number across years treated as duplicates", strict=True)
|
||||
@mock.patch(f"{bk.__name__}.datetime", wraps=datetime)
|
||||
def test_iso_week_number_across_years(self, mock_datetime, add_backup,
|
||||
run_cleanup, check_backups):
|
||||
@@ -383,8 +381,9 @@ class TestBackupCleanup:
|
||||
add_backup("20250112_1200"), # Sun, ISO 2025-W02
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
# Keep weekly: oldest from week 1 (Dec 30) and week 2 (Jan 8)
|
||||
expected = [backups[0], backups[4]]
|
||||
# Keep weekly: oldest from week 1 (Dec 30) and week 2 (Jan 8), plus
|
||||
# the latest snapshot overall (always kept)
|
||||
expected = [backups[0], backups[4], backups[5]]
|
||||
run_cleanup(keep_weekly=10)
|
||||
check_backups(expected)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -931,3 +930,44 @@ class TestDeletionBoundarySafety:
|
||||
run_cleanup(keep_all=0)
|
||||
|
||||
assert not os.path.exists(old.path)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestRetentionPlan:
|
||||
"""Tests for the independent-per-tier retention plan computation."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_latest_snapshot_always_retained_even_if_grouped_with_next(
|
||||
self, backup_dir, add_backup, run_cleanup
|
||||
):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Regression for the bug where the latest snapshot could be
|
||||
evicted if it shared a weekly/monthly/yearly bucket with the
|
||||
next-newest one, because retention carried a single "previous
|
||||
backup" comparison across tier boundaries.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
latest = add_backup("20211111_0300")
|
||||
add_backup("20211110_0300") # same ISO week as latest
|
||||
add_backup("20211004_0100")
|
||||
|
||||
run_cleanup(keep_weekly=5)
|
||||
|
||||
assert os.path.isdir(latest.path)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_quarantined_dir_recovered_by_stale_staging_cleanup(
|
||||
self, backup_dir, add_backup
|
||||
):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
If a crash happens between quarantine (rename) and the recursive
|
||||
delete, the quarantined directory must still get cleaned up on
|
||||
the next startup via cleanup_stale_staging_dirs.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
add_backup("20220101_0000")
|
||||
old = add_backup("20200101_0000")
|
||||
|
||||
quarantine_path = os.path.join(
|
||||
str(backup_dir), f"{bk.STAGING_PREFIX}trash-{old.name}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
os.rename(old.path, quarantine_path)
|
||||
|
||||
bk.cleanup_stale_staging_dirs(str(backup_dir))
|
||||
|
||||
assert not os.path.exists(quarantine_path)
|
||||
+35
-3
@@ -466,12 +466,44 @@ class TestLockHandling:
|
||||
assert result == 1
|
||||
m_release.assert_called_once_with(str(backups_dir))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_skips_cleanup_when_backup_fails(self, tmp_path):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
A failed backup must prevent every retention deletion: if
|
||||
initiate_backup raises, cleanup_old_backups must never run.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
backups_dir = tmp_path / "backups"
|
||||
backups_dir.mkdir()
|
||||
source = tmp_path / "src"
|
||||
source.mkdir()
|
||||
|
||||
from curateipsum import backup
|
||||
|
||||
with mock.patch('sys.argv', ['cura-te-ipsum', '-b',
|
||||
str(backups_dir), str(source)]):
|
||||
with mock.patch('curateipsum.backup.set_backups_lock',
|
||||
return_value=True):
|
||||
with mock.patch(
|
||||
'curateipsum.backup.cleanup_old_backups') \
|
||||
as m_cleanup:
|
||||
with mock.patch(
|
||||
'curateipsum.backup.initiate_backup',
|
||||
side_effect=backup.BackupFailedError("boom")):
|
||||
with mock.patch(
|
||||
'curateipsum.backup.release_backups_lock'):
|
||||
cli.main()
|
||||
|
||||
m_cleanup.assert_not_called()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestBackupExecution:
|
||||
"""Test backup execution flow."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_calls_cleanup_before_initiate(self, tmp_path):
|
||||
"""Should call cleanup_old_backups before initiate_backup."""
|
||||
def test_calls_initiate_before_cleanup(self, tmp_path):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Should call initiate_backup before cleanup_old_backups: retention
|
||||
deletes old snapshots, so it must only run once the new snapshot
|
||||
is durable, never before it.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
backups_dir = tmp_path / "backups"
|
||||
backups_dir.mkdir()
|
||||
source = tmp_path / "src"
|
||||
@@ -497,7 +529,7 @@ class TestBackupExecution:
|
||||
'curateipsum.backup.release_backups_lock'):
|
||||
cli.main()
|
||||
|
||||
assert call_order == ['cleanup', 'initiate']
|
||||
assert call_order == ['initiate', 'cleanup']
|
||||
|
||||
def test_passes_correct_arguments_to_initiate_backup(self, tmp_path):
|
||||
"""Should pass all required arguments to initiate_backup."""
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user